"I am not convinced of anything."
A promising beginning......except that didn't seem to stop you from pissing on Adrian.
" From what I see and deduce, Walsh is guilty."
Join the club.
"The only thing that changed is that I do not have this compelling drive to prove it anymore."
Well, good for you, Keith. What would you call this, catharsis, epiphany, personal growth? And btw, are you under the delusion that the people working to save Bresea see this as the central question anyway, and that in fact they give a damn, either about Walsh's guilt or your opinion?
"As for a viscious attack on duP by O'49er, I think you may want to review the posts and see who is the rapid dog."
I've read the posts, Keith, most more than once. I know who's who and what's what. Who the rapid dog is, and who the rabbit, will develop shortly. You are permitted to speculate on the outcome based on your point of view from the Pro-Bresea camp, the Walshpaper camp, or the Compleat Twit camp. Pick one and join in.
"As for mikesloan being Merrick Walsh. It is not proven by any means......not QED proven."
Not on the thread, it's not.....so far. The existence of Life and even information about certain lifeforms off the thread is a theory gaining favour in some circles, of course those circles being off-thread may somewhat distort their objectivity. Bit of a loop, whot?
"As for the Bre-x thread, in the past I viewed the pro-Walsher's with suspicion of collusion and being paid by Bre-X."
Uh-huh, uh-huh...and then? One sees a "but" coming at this point....
" But I have finally seen a way for a pro-Walsh person to maintain an honest pro-Walsh sentiment without being a part of some illicit group. When I say honest, I do not imply that a pro-Walsher does not have doubts, just that the choice taken is to not be interested in talking about Walsh being guilty."
Ah, the meat....Well said, Keith, but irrelevant. Yes, they may simply be innocently deluded, but who cares? The pro-Bresea camp is interested in the relative guilt of DW only to demonstrate that he is universally regarded as tainted, he is a moron or a crook, a crook or a moron, there is no third choice. Would you buy shares in a David Walsh company? I wouldn't. Ole 49r and Lalit might say they would, but between you and me, they would be more likely to accept options than to pay cash, they are mis-guided people, not stupid people.
" That is OK by me, free choice."
Uh-huh....yes, we all have a free choice, don't we? Some do, and some piss on those who do. Some support Bresea, and some support Walsh.
Where do you stand, Keith? Are you a shareholder? I notice you flamed Adrian for speaking his mind, just what is your justification for speaking yours?
regards........ marcos
PS....give my love to the head Pumpstress, and tell her I may not be around until real late today..... |
