SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ild who wrote (56402)3/21/2006 2:45:57 PM
From: ild  Read Replies (1) of 110194
 
Date: Tue Mar 21 2006 11:00
trotsky (@Bernanke speech) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
good grief...as mentioned previously, the man is a Keynesian monetary crank.
his hobby horse, the 'savings glut' theory, is simply complete nonsense...and this guy headed the economics department at a US university? the mind boggles.
also, not the tiniest shred of credible evidence is offered as to why the yield curve's flattening/inversion is 'different this time'. he's just parroting what Greenspan pronounced on the matter ( likewise sans evidence ) .
apart from the panic-induced brief inversion during the '98 financial crisis, every yield curve inversion since 1858 has produced a recession ( if memory doesn't fail me ) . so we can choose to either believe a bureaucrat who by all appearances is an economic illiterate ( albeit garnished with degrees and accolades, which is more of a comment on the system than on the man ) , or the historical evidence.
i propose we should go with the historical evidence...just a hunch.

Date: Tue Mar 21 2006 14:02
trotsky (Apollo@Grasberg) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
as often mentioned before, political risk is one of the most overhyped commodities. obviously the market thinks this is a transitory issue, as evidenced by most copper stocks not doing much of anything in response.
that said, FCX has the problem of being a one mine pony. should there really be more extensive trouble, the company has a real problem. otoh, who honestly believes the Indonesian military can be challenged by a couple of bow-and-arrow wielding villagers? the Indonesian military has a certain reputation preceding it so to speak.

Date: Tue Mar 21 2006 13:12
trotsky (slowman@CDE) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
as far as i can tell, there's nothing wrong with it. the decision to issue shares in exchange for the silver content of a polymetallic deposit in Australia for instance was a very wise one ( they got those silver rights very cheap ) .
in addition, CDE regularly reports convincing exploration success at its South American properties, and via its relatively high cost US silver mines it sports extremely good leverage to the silver price. lastly, a look at the chart confirms a solid uptrend is underway in the stock, which sort of belies all the b*tching and moaning about CDE in these here parts.

Date: Tue Mar 21 2006 11:12
trotsky (Bleuler, 8:13) ID#248269:
Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
" If you choose to believe in conspiracy theories that is your privelege. "

this in reference to the question of whether one should believe the 'official' version of the events on 9-11.
what can i say? the government's tale IS ALSO a conspiracy theory.
in fact, it's a pretty elaborate one with a great number of to this day unexplained holes in it ( from illegal pre-attack share trades that were NEVER traced , to magical Arab passports that survived an inferno unscathed that brought down two skyscrapers plus a neighboring building , to an NSA travel warning to Mr. Ashcroft on 9-10, telling him not to use commercial flights, and so forth - note i'm not referring to any of the more outlandish conspiratorial claims by skeptics, but merely a few of the known facts that should give everybody pause ) .
in short, it is not a question of WHETHER one believes a conspiracy theory, but only a question of WHICH one.
regardless of whether the governmant's tale eventually turns out to have been the correct version, at this stage it is just another conspiracy theory.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext