Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dan B. who wrote (74781)	3/24/2006 9:24:00 PM
From: Cogito	Read Replies (1) of 81568

>>The post to which I reply is false, re: "It either stands or it's not proven. Can't be both." Yes, "it" can be both. The question is one of viability. The evidence (testimony and evidence on each side) stands, and does not include proof that the allegation is false nor true. Hence silly suggestions here that the story has been proven false, remain false. Hence, the story remains viable.<< Dan - Really? The story remains viable though it is not proven? So I can make up anything I want to, and if it can't be proved or disproved, then it can be repeated as though it were a fact? Good thing the criminal justice system doesn't work that way. Think about it. You need real evidence to convict one person of a crime. You have to be able to prove your story stands. You can't just say, "Well, we say he did it, and he can't prove he didn't." Yet, for some reason, you seem to think there should be a lesser standard for deciding whether or not to go to war. - Allen

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next