SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Peter Dierks who wrote (6542)3/27/2006 8:53:44 AM
From: haqihana  Read Replies (3) of 71588
 
Peter, I don't even want to get involved in a discussion about Social Security, and the add ons that came over time. Even though I was quite young when SS began, when I was old enough to understand things, I was against the fact that it even existed, and how it was being handled by the government. Any person that worked for a living, would have been better off if he had invested the same amount of money that was removed from his paycheck, and earned the interest on that money. With the government involved, only about 30 cents of every dollar collected gets to the recepient, because of the cost of all the red tape we have come to ignore in governmental projects.

I do know that I was docked the maximum from 1959 until 1987, and lesser percentages before, and after those dated, and I want my money back before I die. Damnit! It's my money, and I don't want it going to some deadbeat.

Social Security was sold to the nation by FDR with the impression that the money would be kept in a separate, and protected, fund, but they have just dumped that into the the overall funds of the government, which removes any inkling of security.

I don't know what the answer will be, but probably won't be around when the feces hits the fan.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext