Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: zonkie who wrote (184138)	3/27/2006 10:13:22 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Which brings us to the big question. Should we let george bush off the hook just because he is the president? The republicans say yes. Which brings us to the really big question. Why are liberals focusing so strongly on a President who is not going to be in office in two years rather than presenting cogent and realistic alternative proposals to the Bush policies they apparently so disdain?? Criticism can go only so far.. Nobody likes, or trusts, people can do nothing but complain about people who are actually doing something.. Even if that "something" might not seem to be the best policy. People want ANSWERS, and they want success. So are Democrats more interested in destroying Bush than they are in confronting and destroying Islamo-Fascism? I opine that pragmatic and objective people would say yes.. Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next