SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: longnshort who wrote (281935)3/28/2006 3:08:25 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Read Replies (2) of 1572366
 
Re: No I would say the French did that, since they are such PIGS

Talking of pigs, how come Israel and the Disneyesque Gulag (aka the US of A) have not the same election laws, especially as regards inmate disenfranchisement? Clue:

Mar. 27, 2006 23:42 | Updated Mar. 28, 2006 5:14
Yigal Amir among 9,000 jailed voters
By YIGAL GRAYEFF


More than 9,000 prisoners are eligible to vote in Tuesday's elections, including Yigal Amir, who will be the first to cast his ballot in the prison where he is incarcerated.

"He will be brought to the polling booth in the prison offices and then he will be returned to his cell, after which the other prisoners will vote," Israel Prisons Service (IPS) spokeswoman Major Orit Stelser said on Sunday. Amir is located in the Ayalon maximum security facility in Ramle, where he is serving a life sentence for the murder of Yitzhak Rabin in 1995.

Brigadier Nazeem Sbete, the commander of the Sharon region, said that any prisoner who held an Israeli identity card had the right to vote. "It doesn't matter what he did," he said.

At least one prisoner is running in the election. British electrician Daniel Pinner is No. 10 on the Herut list, although given his party's anonymity in the polls it does not appear that he will win a seat.

In January, Pinner was convicted of shooting an Arab in the leg during clashes in June between Palestinians and Jews on the beach in Gush Katif. He is due to be sentenced at the beginning of April and, although he has admitted firing his gun in the air, he has denied any wrongdoing.

Sbete declined to speculate about the political leanings of the prisoners or which parties they would support.

"We don't carry out surveys. We are forbidden from being involved in this," he said. "Election propaganda is also forbidden in the IPS. Every prisoner is allowed to telephone and receive information. Apart from this there is no activity. They are allowed to listen to the election campaigning on television and on the radio."

Sbete also wouldn't say which way prison officers tended to vote.

"Everybody has their ideology, everybody has their direction. They vote as they want to," he said.

The elections commission is to supervise the voting, although the prison officers are to be responsible for ensuring that every inmate is able to cast a ballot, either by taking prisoners to polling booths or by bringing the ballot boxes to the prisoners.

Because of this, and in order to strengthen security, the IPS would increase its manpower on duty Tuesday, Sbete said, although he was expecting a quiet day. This was because, as elsewhere in the country, Tuesday is to be a day off in the IPS, so inmates would not go to work or have any classes.

Prison officers are to be able to vote inside the jails and would do so by placing their ballots in a double envelope, as soldiers do.

jpost.com

Published on Friday, July 14, 2000 in the Boston Globe
Let Prisoners Keep The Right To Vote
by Robert Drinan


commondreams.org

Excerpt:

...the incredible fact that there are 3.9 million Americans who cannot vote because they were or are prisoners. Of that figure 1.4 million are African-American males.

The laws of 47 states impose disenfranchisement for all prisoners and former prisoners. Only Massachusetts, Maine, and Vermont impose no restrictions on inmates or former inmates.

Disenfranchisement laws in the United States are a vestige of medieval times when offenders were banished or suffered ''civil death.'' Laws in Southern states banning former prisoners from voting were enacted in the late 1800s amid clear signs of racism. In the literature about America's shameful exclusion of almost 4 million citizens from the ballot box there is virtually no one who offers any rational justification for this anomaly almost unknown in any other nation. The practice clearly does not promote the reintegration of the offender into society. The denial of the vote to ex-convicts goes against all trends in the past century that extended the vote to women, blacks, and 18-year-olds.

The denial of the right to vote to former prisoners shares the dark history of literacy tests, poll taxes, and grandfather clauses. The goal of universal suffrage has been central to America for well over a century.

One would think that denying the vote to any former convict is illegal. But the 14th Amendment provides that states may exclude citizens from voting ''for participation in rebellion, or other crime.''

In 1974, the US Supreme Court used the words ''or other crime'' to allow disenfranchisement. The argument that the words ''or other crime'' obviously relate to some form of rebellion did not sway the court.
[...]
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext