SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sully- who wrote (18644)3/31/2006 1:57:40 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) of 35834
 
The Censure Farce Continues

Posted by John
Power Line

The Associated Press reported today that Russ Feingold has invited John Dean, former White House counsel who was imprisoned and disbarred following Watergate (great witness!), to testify at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in favor of censuring President Bush for using electronic surveillance of international communications to catch terrorists:

<<< Dean, a one-time White House counsel under President Nixon, testified before the Senate committee investigating the events that eventually led to Nixon's impeachment.

He recently wrote a column comparing Bush's conduct to Nixon's, saying both authorized warrantless wiretapping and broke the law. >>>


That's Dean's opinion, and I suppose he's entitled to it. But when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Nixon's surveillance in internal security cases was illegal in United States v. United States District Court, 407 U.S. 297 (1972), it specifically distinguished between the case before it and surviellance involving foreign intelligence. The Court said that its holding did not apply to surveillance for purposes of foreign intelligence gathering, as is involved in the NSA program:

    [T]he instant case requires no judgment on the scope of 
the President's surveillance power with respect to the
activities of foreign powers, within or without this
country.
And again:
    We emphasize, before concluding this opinion, the scope 
of our decision. As stated at the outset, this case
involves only the domestic aspects of national security.
We have not addressed, and express no opinion as to, the
issues which may be involved with respect to activities
of foreign powers or their agents.
With all due respect to Mr. Dean, I don't think the President was required to consult him before acting to protect the American people from terrorists. I think the President was entitled to rely on the six federal appellate court opinions that have held that the President has the constitutional authority to carry out warrantless electronic surveillance for foreign intelligence gathering purposes.

powerlineblog.com

duluthsuperior.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext