SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dan B. who wrote (75063)4/4/2006 3:02:35 AM
From: CogitoRead Replies (1) of 81568
 
Dan -

How interesting. The news makes one of the points I was trying to make. Here's a story from U.S.A. Today, dated 3/21/2006. (emphasis mine)

N. Korea: U.S. does not have 'monopoly' on pre-emptive strike

From staff and wire reports

SEOUL — North Korea said Tuesday that it had the ability to launch a pre-emptive attack on the United States in its latest threat since being told it must stop its illegal trade activities.

"Our strong revolutionary might put in place all measures to counter (a) possible U.S. pre-emptive strike," the North Korea Foreign Ministry said, according to the Korean Central News Agency. "Pre-emptive strike is not the monopoly of the United States."

The ministry also said the North had built atomic weapons to counter the U.S. nuclear threat.

"We made nuclear weapons because of a nuclear threat from the United States," the ministry said.

usatoday.com

- Allen

PS: One result of promoting "pre-emptive defense" is that those who may feel threatened by us can only feel more so. Fear makes people do dangerous things. The more we talk about striking first against those who might wish us harm, the more likely it is that North Korea will actually launch nuclear missiles at us.

The difference between our approach to Iraq and our handling of North Korea teaches Iran an important lesson: "Better get nukes fast, so the U.S. will be afraid of you."

By the way, in addition to international pressure, sanctions, covert actions, etc. (the stick), options for dealing with Iran and other dangerous nations include offering carrots, in the form of cooperation and financial aid.

As the news from North Korea indicates, the best argument against the doctrine of "pre-emptive defense" is that it won't ultimately work.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext