FREE AMERICA Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : FREE AMERICA

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: michael97123 who wrote (1455)	4/4/2006 3:28:16 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (2) of 14758

>>>In 1960 there were roughly 180mm americans. Now there are over 300mm. I dont get what you mean.<<< More and more I'm coming to the conclusion that the only way to save the planet is to have smaller nations. Overall, and history has proven this, I think large nations do more harm than good for societies of people. I think the most popular slogan of the past few decades has been: "Think globally; act locally!" Think what it might be like if every nation with 75 million people or more were to respectively divide into two or three nations. I don't think the art of technology would be lost, I think it'd become more efficient; and trade and labor might become more reasonable. And, like with the European Union, unions of nations of interest and common goals would replace the larger countries. Many always complain the UN is ineffective. Perhaps if the UN were dealing with nations that weren't larger than the UN itself, it could become more effective in solving the pressing issues of the world, certainly in a less greedy manner than how disputes get solved today. Oh, well--so much for my Thought of the Day--lol!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next