SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hawkmoon who wrote (184578)4/4/2006 7:28:23 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Then they will be violating the written tenets of their constitution.

Not true. Their constitution has an internal inconsitency in that regard. On one hand Islamic law is its basis, while on the other it is to tolerate religious freedom. Thats what I've been trying to point out. There is nothing that I know of that requires any constitution to be internally consistent. I'm sure if you look closely enough, most will have problems. But the Afghan one seems pretty major IMO.

If we continue to see intransigence that indicates that Islamo-Fascists are taking control then we will have to deal with it as we dealt with the Taliban.

What if the majority of people there approve? Is it any of our business? If the Europeans want to force gay marriage rights on American, is it any of there business? Forcing change on the unwilling, seldom works AFAIK.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News