2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 416.74

+1.2%

Dec 26 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TobagoJack who wrote (5324)	4/6/2006 2:56:47 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) of 218792

TJ, gold is nearly at $600 an ounce, which is a third of the way to $2000 an ounce, which you have long talked of as being some kind of target, assuming things don't go too badly and just lumber along in the normal misbegotten way. If there is carnage and catastrophe, then I think you suggested $40,000 an ounce wouldn't be out of the question. Financial relativity theory is alive and well and Big Ben has got his hand firmly on the tiller. Lapping G again is proving difficult for Q which is hovering in the vicinity, not far behind at 510 vs 580. G had better not slip up as US$ interest rates continue to rise and the non-existent Happy Meal payments for holding G leave too many hungry for a bit more action in the real world where Big Macs, Happy Meals galore and Whoppers are being gobbled furiously. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next