Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 48.89

+0.3%

12:07 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (183946)	4/6/2006 10:26:10 AM
From: Yousef	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Sarmad, Re: "Dr. Ruiz's answer (quoted earlier) says it does not work well. And in fact it turned out that it did not work well (UMC). maybe he changed his mind, or sees there is no other quick way to get to 65 nm at this time." AMD's JV with UMC was a disaster ... Same for many companies working with UMC. The 65nm process at CHRT is not internally developed. It is the IBM 65nm process transfered to CHRT in Fab7. Maybe this has already been discussed (I have been away for awhile). It would make a lot of sense for AMD to "hook up" with IBM for future silicon technology ... CHRT just happens to be the place where IBM is transferring this technology. As a historical look, CHRT has considerable experinece with process tranfers. But I would expect that the 65nm/90nm processes from IBM will be running on IBM "dictated" equipment set. Make It So, Yousef

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next