SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Road Walker who wrote (283287)4/6/2006 7:15:51 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 1573116
 
The middle, lower middle, and lower classes didn't get much in Bush's tax cuts. The upper classes got a fortune (compared to anyone else) from the tax cuts. They really didn't need it, some other folks need it a lot more.

And the last time that taxes where increased before that the rich paid a lot more extra dollars than the poor or middle class did.

If increases hits cost the rich more than the poor or middle class than cuts should help the rich more. Either that or you have a choice between 1 - Taxes almost never changing, or 2 - Taxes for the rich staying on a continually increasing trend until eventually they reach 100% or you decide that its ok for tax cuts to help out the rich more than everyone else.

If you really think government tax policy should be that the rich get $100,000's richer each year, while the poor get a few $Bucks a month

When the rich are paying thousands of times more in taxes then the poor there benefit from the cuts should be thousands of times bigger. If the rich where paying a lower percentage then the poor you might have a point, even more so if they where paying less dollars per person then the poor, but neither one of those is close to being true, quite the opposite.

it's all about party dogma not libertarian.

"Soak the rich" is a rather anti-libertarian idea.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext