SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Orcastraiter who wrote (75190)4/6/2006 11:38:02 PM
From: SkywatcherRead Replies (2) of 81568
 
Ex-aide says Bush authorized leak
By David Johnston and David E. Sanger The New York Times

FRIDAY, APRIL 7, 2006


WASHINGTON President George W. Bush authorized Vice President Dick Cheney in July 2003 to permit Cheney's chief of staff, I. Lewis Libby Jr., to leak to a reporter key portions of a classified prewar intelligence estimate on Iraq, according to Libby's grand jury testimony disclosed in court papers.

The court filing late Wednesday provided the first indication that Bush, who has long assailed leaks of classified information as a national security threat, played a direct role in the disclosure of the intelligence report on Iraq and also was involved in the swirl of events leading to the disclosure of the identity of an undercover CIA officer.

The grand jury testimony by Libby, who has been charged with perjury and obstruction in the CIA leak case, is said by prosecutors to indicate that Cheney obtained explicit approval from Bush to permit Libby to divulge portions of a National Intelligence Estimate regarding Iraq's efforts to develop nuclear weapons.

The disclosure prompted Democrats to demand that the White House be forthcoming about Bush's role.

Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic leader, released a statement saying: "In light of today's shocking revelation, President Bush must fully disclose his participation in the selective leaking of classified information. The American people must know the truth."

The court filing said that Libby testified that the "Vice President advised defendant that the President had authorized defendant to disclose certain information in the N.I.E."

The prosecutors said Libby testified that he recalled the circumstances "getting approval from the President through the Vice President to discuss material that would be classified but for that approval were unique in his recollection."

The leak was intended, the court papers suggested, as a rebuttal to an Op- Ed article published in The New York Times on July 6 by Joseph Wilson, a former ambassador who wrote that he had traveled to Africa in 2002 after Cheney had raised questions about possible nuclear purchases by Iraq.

Wilson wrote that he concluded it was "highly doubtful" Saddam Hussein had sought to buy nuclear fuel from Niger.

At Cheney's office, the Op-Ed article was viewed "as a direct attack on credibility of the Vice President (and the President) on a matter of signal importance: the rationale for the war in Iraq," according to the court papers.

The presidential authorization was provided, the court papers said, before a meeting on July 8, 2003, between Libby and Judith Miller, then a reporter for The Times.

Libby brought a brief abstract of the National Intelligence Estimate's key judgments to the meeting, which was held in the lobby of the St. Regis Hotel about two blocks from the White House.

Libby testified, prosecutors said, that he was "specifically authorized in advance of the meeting to disclose the key judgments of the classified N.I.E. to Miller on that occasion because it was thought that the N.I.E. was 'pretty definitive' against what Ambassador Wilson had said and that the Vice President thought that it was 'very important' for the key judgments of the N.I.E. to come out."

The court filing said that Libby said "he understood that that was to tell Ms. Miller, among other things, that a key judgment of the N.I.E. held that Iraq was 'vigorously trying to procure' uranium."

Libby, the prosecutors said, testified that the meeting with Miller was the "only time he recalled in his government experience when he disclosed a document to a reporter that was effectively declassified by virtue of the President's authorization that it be disclosed."

Libby testified that he first told Cheney that he could not have such a conversation with Miller because the intelligence estimate on Iraq was classified. Libby testified that Cheney later told him that Bush had authorized the release of "relevant portions."

Libby told the grand jury that he also spoke with David Addington, then a lawyer for Cheney, whom Libby regarded as an expert on national security law. "Mr. Addington opined that Presidential authorization to publicly disclose a document amounted to declassification of the document."

Libby testified that at the meeting he did not discuss Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame Wilson, the CIA officer at the center of the leak inquiry, because "he had forgotten by that time that he learned about Ms. Wilson's CIA employment a month earlier from the Vice President."

Miller in her Oct. 16, 2005, account of the meeting said that her notes showed that the two had discussed Wilson's wife, who, according to her notes, worked in a unit of the CIA that is engaged in the intelligence assessments of unconventional weapons.

Miller said that Libby discussed a chronology of what she said he described as "credible evidence" of Iraq's efforts to acquire uranium.

She made no reference to whether Libby referred to any material as derived from the intelligence estimate, but said that he alluded to two reports - one in 1999 and another in 2002 - that seemed to support the contention that Iraq was interested in obtaining uranium.

WASHINGTON President George W. Bush authorized Vice President Dick Cheney in July 2003 to permit Cheney's chief of staff, I. Lewis Libby Jr., to leak to a reporter key portions of a classified prewar intelligence estimate on Iraq, according to Libby's grand jury testimony disclosed in court papers.

The court filing late Wednesday provided the first indication that Bush, who has long assailed leaks of classified information as a national security threat, played a direct role in the disclosure of the intelligence report on Iraq and also was involved in the swirl of events leading to the disclosure of the identity of an undercover CIA officer.

The grand jury testimony by Libby, who has been charged with perjury and obstruction in the CIA leak case, is said by prosecutors to indicate that Cheney obtained explicit approval from Bush to permit Libby to divulge portions of a National Intelligence Estimate regarding Iraq's efforts to develop nuclear weapons.

The disclosure prompted Democrats to demand that the White House be forthcoming about Bush's role.

Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic leader, released a statement saying: "In light of today's shocking revelation, President Bush must fully disclose his participation in the selective leaking of classified information. The American people must know the truth."

The court filing said that Libby testified that the "Vice President advised defendant that the President had authorized defendant to disclose certain information in the N.I.E."

The prosecutors said Libby testified that he recalled the circumstances "getting approval from the President through the Vice President to discuss material that would be classified but for that approval were unique in his recollection."

The leak was intended, the court papers suggested, as a rebuttal to an Op- Ed article published in The New York Times on July 6 by Joseph Wilson, a former ambassador who wrote that he had traveled to Africa in 2002 after Cheney had raised questions about possible nuclear purchases by Iraq.

Wilson wrote that he concluded it was "highly doubtful" Saddam Hussein had sought to buy nuclear fuel from Niger.

At Cheney's office, the Op-Ed article was viewed "as a direct attack on credibility of the Vice President (and the President) on a matter of signal importance: the rationale for the war in Iraq," according to the court papers.

The presidential authorization was provided, the court papers said, before a meeting on July 8, 2003, between Libby and Judith Miller, then a reporter for The Times.

Libby brought a brief abstract of the National Intelligence Estimate's key judgments to the meeting, which was held in the lobby of the St. Regis Hotel about two blocks from the White House.

Libby testified, prosecutors said, that he was "specifically authorized in advance of the meeting to disclose the key judgments of the classified N.I.E. to Miller on that occasion because it was thought that the N.I.E. was 'pretty definitive' against what Ambassador Wilson had said and that the Vice President thought that it was 'very important' for the key judgments of the N.I.E. to come out."

The court filing said that Libby said "he understood that that was to tell Ms. Miller, among other things, that a key judgment of the N.I.E. held that Iraq was 'vigorously trying to procure' uranium."

Libby, the prosecutors said, testified that the meeting with Miller was the "only time he recalled in his government experience when he disclosed a document to a reporter that was effectively declassified by virtue of the President's authorization that it be disclosed."

Libby testified that he first told Cheney that he could not have such a conversation with Miller because the intelligence estimate on Iraq was classified. Libby testified that Cheney later told him that Bush had authorized the release of "relevant portions."

Libby told the grand jury that he also spoke with David Addington, then a lawyer for Cheney, whom Libby regarded as an expert on national security law. "Mr. Addington opined that Presidential authorization to publicly disclose a document amounted to declassification of the document."

Libby testified that at the meeting he did not discuss Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame Wilson, the CIA officer at the center of the leak inquiry, because "he had forgotten by that time that he learned about Ms. Wilson's CIA employment a month earlier from the Vice President."

Miller in her Oct. 16, 2005, account of the meeting said that her notes showed that the two had discussed Wilson's wife, who, according to her notes, worked in a unit of the CIA that is engaged in the intelligence assessments of unconventional weapons.

Miller said that Libby discussed a chronology of what she said he described as "credible evidence" of Iraq's efforts to acquire uranium.

She made no reference to whether Libby referred to any material as derived from the intelligence estimate, but said that he alluded to two reports - one in 1999 and another in 2002 - that seemed to support the contention that Iraq was interested in obtaining uranium.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext