SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : BRE-X, Indonesia, Ashanti Goldfields, Strong Companies.

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Keith F. Wunderlich who wrote (27006)9/19/1997 8:44:00 PM
From: Adrian du Plessis   of 28369
 
Keith, I'm not clear on why you personally send me the following e-mail and then go on this thread and attack me. What gives?

"Adrian, Thank you for taking me into your confidence. That post to you was
strictly for your benefit if you needed a way out of a dilemna, as well to
give another shot to the 49er. I know with all my heart she is a paid shill
for Bre-x but I have no proof. I have been having a lot of fun with her
yanking her chain every which way. When I first entered the thread to help
you, I set a goal to uncover who is who on the thread as far as 'owned'
shills. If possible I will expose them for what they are, and if possible
'force' them to spill the beans first, and publicly implicate Walsh. It is
taking patience and a lot of luck, as I believe I have got 49er starting to
crack. She is faced with a question of what is more important, her
reputation in the field or betraying Walsh. I don't know if you have been
watching but this is the second time she has been shoved off the thread, to
figure out what angle I am coming at. If you pay close attention you can
read messages within the messages between us. Though my poker hand is a
complete bluff, she does not know it. I read an article once about Thomas
Devlin. In it was the comment that Bre-x wanted him as a director, something
to do with investor relations. The request was denied by the authorities due
to a shady past in the industry. My leap of logic is that Thomas Devlin is
the man behind the various shills on the thread giving out directions to
actual people as to what the party line is for Walsh. I have also postulated
that the bogus personalities are his writing directly. I do not know if
there is an actual Merrick Walsh or if that name was a smokescreen. I have
brought the name of up twice (Devlin) and both times it is followed with a
rash of BS posts which I find are to move the post out of viewing range. I
find it very interesting that you are the only person who even acknowledged
that the post was made. I especially thank you for trusting me, although I
have put out this mystery personae that no one can be sure what angle I am
taking or what I must know. Hope this bit of information clears up anything
that I may have posted that is not understood. My modus operandi is, if it
looks like the enemy might start to get the upperhand, then go into 'confuse
the enemy' mode, and the likelihood is thet they will cough up a weak point
before they realize what they have said. By the way it follows in my
intuitive analysis that bigdude also is Devlin (if I am right about him
being the organizer). As far as D.Clarke goes I think his motivation is
clean, and worthy of support. I just think for your overall purpose, this
can be perceived as a conflict, and why give anybody ammunition that can
harm you in the trenches. Just my opinion. If you do not mind, let me know
if you hear anything to support or refute my little theory, I still have a
lot to learn. Keith"
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext