Adrian, you are so funny. My posts have been very clear what I first
thought towards 49'er when I first read her on other threads, how it
changed for the worse once I disected the threads, and how I have come to regain
respect, and actually view her as above suspicion once I took a look
from her point of view.
As with you I first had a tremendous amount of respect for you, or what
I thought was you. Then the little chinks in the character started to
show, which I was willing to overlook, but soon the little chinks
turned out to be the real you, and the saintly 'watchdog' turned out to
be the act. C'est la vie.
Ever changed your mind? I do plenty, when new information comes to light.
I make my judgements as best I can based on the information at hand.
I am curious, will you be posting your own E-mails to me? I will not be
as I consider private E-mails private, no matter what.
I chose not to go on record here with a view towards keeping Walsh
or replacing with Don Clarkes group, but now you post one for me. My personal
belief is a clean start would be better, Don Clarke appears to be a
well intentioned person, from what I have read. But the truth of the
matter is it is none of my business to be posting about shareholder
matters, therefore I did not.
As for you, see if you can stomach again what you wrote to Lalit and 49'er
that day that I realized you were out of control.
You can impartially view the game from the outside, or you can play
the game and choose sides. Pay close attention to your comment to Lalit
about intellectual dishonesty and see if it hits home with you.
Support D. Clark all you want just do not claim to be impartial.
Investigate all you want for Diane Francis, just do not claim to be
here for the truth when the best you have shown is a 'probably' yet
you ram it home like it is 'proven' and whoever disagrees needs to have
their viewpoint brutalized.
BTW, in an earlier post I had a typo. 'rapid dog' is actually supposed
to be 'rabid dog'.
I hope others I have E-mailed to on other threads do not follow your
example, it is embarassing enough to face how fooled I can be in an open
forum, nevermind the paranoid ramblings I have been known to have while
trying to find out who is who in this SI business.
I am glad with this last post of yours to see I will not have to ever
change my mind about you, that I have seen things as they actually are
with you.
Commandant Adrian duPlicity, in seeking to serve your own needs, which
I can see is all that matters to you, have you considered how it will
affect Don Clarke, the person you are supposedly supporting?
I will leave it at that for now but I reserve the right to add a bit
more if I feel it is needed.
Keith |
