SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Julian Augustus who wrote (9084)4/13/2006 10:42:56 AM
From: Anchan  Read Replies (1) of 78426
 
Re: EPM -- julianaugustus wrote "...puzzling.[...] The bank is going to lend you $75m, but meanwhile they are holding $20m of your money until they give you the $75m? Is the management just completely incompetent or am I missing something?"
IF European Minerals fail to sign a proper contract with their contractor SENET by May 1, the bankers *may* withdraw the Debt Facility. Since that would entail EPM having to cough up more than $20 million into the bankers' coffers, which they would do their damndest to avoid, the bankers cleverly keep those $20 million in a "secure account" in the first place -- is my impression. Am I wrong?
And no, no *additional* $70 million would be necessary to complete building the mine (unless EPM lose the debt facility, of course). It's just that the Q4 report says they have $56 million in working capital. Adding to this the debt facility of $75m, EPM would still need some $20m more to open the door to Aladdin's cave.
(But, boy, what a cave -- if they just find the right word.)
Disclaimer 1: I no nuttin.
Disclaimer 2: Long EPM.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext