Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neeka who wrote (163751)	4/16/2006 10:51:29 PM
From: KLP	Read Replies (2) of 793840

ALL births, whether or not they were a home birth or hospital were to be registered with the State from at least 1900-1912...depending on the State. Therefore these people born in 1900 would be 106 by now. And those born in 1912, would be 94 or so.... How many of them don't have social security? My guess is ALL of them have social security..... If they didn't have their birth registered, they couldn't get SS unless they had a Birth Certificate that was accompanied by at least two or three letters certified, that told how and why they knew these people, and for how long.... My Grandparents all had to get this late registration of Birth, and certified as I noted above, because all of them were born in the 1880's and 1890's, and birth certificates were not used them. But in two cases the Town Clerk had a record of the births... When SS came aboard, and they were old enough to qualify to receive it, they had to get the Late Registration cards with the letters attached... So IMO, the idea that people can't provide ID of some sort, is a smokescreen.....Unless somehow they are collecting SS and shouldn't be.....

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next