SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (737120)4/18/2006 6:54:55 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
A) The U.S. is currently spending around $6 billion a month on Iraq.
Source?
Hey, sonny, you get no freebies.

B) To date, expenditures have totaled an estimated $320 billion, although a supplemental bill for more is now working its way through Congress.
Source? You made the claim, not me.

Now, three different projections of estimated final costs:

Study #1) --- A study by the Congressional Budget Office forecast an additional $225 billion in direct spending over the next 10 years, [note: above and beyond the $320 Billion already spent...] assuming troop levels fall to 50,000 in a few years.
Source?

Study #2) --- "Taken together, it is quite possible that the United States will ultimately spend more on U.S. military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan than it did on the Korean War ($455 billion) or the Vietnam War ($650 billion)," according to a report by Steven Kosiak, a budget analyst with the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments..
Source?
BTW, the Korean War is technically not over. There never was a peace treaty signed. And there a re STILL bullets crossing that DMZ.
NOW: Are you going to HONESTLY claim that Iraq has cost/will cost as much as a year that started 56 years ago and is still going? Really?

But let's take a look at a bit of that war:

Korean War (1950-1953) Total Servicemenbers (Worldwide)
5,720,000
Battle Deaths 33,686
Other Deaths (In Theater) 2,830
Other Deaths in Service (Non-Theater) 17,730
Non-mortal Woundings
103,284
Living Veterans 3,913,749*

So we've had about 2,400 US deaths in Iraq and about 17,000 woundings and the cost is the same as 34,000 dead ans 103,000 woundings? ARE YOU SERIOUS???????

>>>>>> (SPECIAL NOTE: breaking out the expenditures for 'rebuilding' in just Iraq --- as has been recently reported in numerous media --- and the US is *just now* reaching the level of spending that we allocated to Germany after WW II (in real terms) --- about $49 Billion in current dollars. That is ALREADY *twice* what was spent on rebuilding in Japan after WW II.)<<<<<<<<<
B***s**t. Prove it. Japan and Germany were leveled at the end of WW II. The only way THAT could happen is the US did a dribble that went into that bucket and the rest went into Marshall Plan (remember that) or something similiar.

Study #3) --- A third study by Nobel Prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, estimated the total cost for the Iraq/Afghanistan War by the time it is all over to be in the range of $750 billion to $1.2 trillion. A big part of that, he says, is the continuing cost of health-care for the more than 17,000 soldiers wounded in the Iraq conflict. (And, of course, interest upon the sovereign debt issued to finance war operations....)
Which again shows a properly biased source determined to "prove" a point can prove anything. And you've proven NOTHING. You presented nothing but a few numbers with no justification.

Wanna try again? See if you can come up with something other than wild claims this time.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext