CV2002-023934 Case Type Civil File Date 12/12/2002
11/29/2005 OXS - Order To Extend Time For Service 12/1/2005
NOTE: UNTIL APRIL 30,2006
superiorcourt.maricopa.gov
From: Floyd3491@...
Date: Sat Jan 10, 2004 1:15 am
Subject: Who is Floyd Schneider and why is he interested in Zicam? floydtheonea...
Dear Friends.
My name is Floyd Schneider and I would like you to know why I have posted so much information on this thread about Zicam. I first became aware of anosmia and Zicam when doing a search on google on the company that markets Zicam Matrixx Initiative Inc. previously known as Gum Tech International. I started to expose the dangers and warning signs on silicon investor and yahoo mtxx /gumm message boards. In a attempt to silence the truth Matrixx has filed a SLAPP suit against me and has added my wife also to the suit. The suit is located here superiorcourt.maricopa.gov
More of the post is at: health.groups.yahoo.com
CV2004-001338 Case Type Civil File Date 1/23/2004
Kenneth W Wigton Plaintiff Male Daniel Radacosky
superiorcourt.maricopa.gov
CV2004-021668 Case Type Civil File Date 11/17/2004
superiorcourt.maricopa.gov
CV2005-002569 Case Type Civil File Date 2/11/2005
superiorcourt.maricopa.gov
CV2004-001338 02/16/2005
Docket Code 023 Form V000A Page 2
While the Court does not sit to enforce ethical rules generally, there is no doubt of its inherent authority to regulate the conduct of lawyers who appear before it. Here, the Court finds that Mr. Radacosky’s anonymous, message-board postings were made in connection with the representation of his clients in these pending, consolidated cases. No other conclusion is plausible. Mr. Radacosky’s failure to disclose his role and direct interest in the issues which are the subject of those message-board postings is, in the Court’s view, a violation of ER 4.1(a) (“Truthfulness in Statements to Others”) and ER 4.3(“Dealing With Unrepresented Person”) and potentially a violation of ER 8.4(c) (“Misconduct”). Without deciding the wisdom of Mr. Radacosky’s activities or whether those activities conflict with his own clients’ interests, it is clear that his postings have no purpose but to harm a litigation adversary......
courtminutes.maricopa.gov
Re: 2/18/05 - [MTXX] Judge Rules Attorney's Failure to Disclose his Identity on Yahoo Violated the Law....
Message 21060618
veribull gets sued!!!
by: painfullyblunt2004 04/06/05 04:59 pm Msg: 111638
fullofbull is now officially a defendant in a defamation suit. Don't spend all my money golfing, fullofbull. I don't want to have to execute a judgment on your golf clubs.
finance.messages.yahoo.com
CV2005-005820 Case Type Civil File Date 4/6/2005
superiorcourt.maricopa.gov
From: AsturiasPh.D/MBA
Message 21531900
Re: 4/6/05 - [MTXX] Radacosky vs. John Doe
Message 21223168
Filed: 7/05/2005 Number: 1-05-CV-044455
sccaseinfo.org
Filed: 7/08/2005
Hearing officers report about a six-count complaint filed November 29, 2004
supremecourt.az.gov
Re: 7/14/05 - [MTXX] Radacosky vs. John Doe: Radacosky Subpoenas Yahoo...
Message 21507468
Re: 7/20/05 - [MTXX] Radacosky vs. John Doe: Radacosky Subpoenas Additional Information from Yahoo Posters
Message 21533072
Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona
Saturday, October 15, 2005
Consideration of the Hearing Officer’s Report recommending a six month and one day suspension, probation upon reinstatement (length and terms to be determined upon reinstatement), restitution, and costs.
supreme.state.az.us;
Disciplinary Commission Report filed November 14, 2005
Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona on October 15, 2005 pursuant to Rule 58, Ariz. R. S. Ct., for consideration of the Hearing Officer's report filed July 8, 2005 recommending a six month and one-day suspension, probation upon reinstatement with length and terms and conditions to be determined upon reinstatement, restitution and costs of these disciplinary proceedings, respondent filed an objection and requested oral argument.
supremecourt.az.gov
Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona
Saturday, November 19, 2005
Consideration of the Hearing Officer’s Report recommending transfer to disability inactive status.
supremecourt.az.gov
TEN DAYS LATER
ATTORNEYS TRANSFERRED TO DISABILITY INACTIVE STATUS - 2005
ATTORNEY FILE NO. STATUS DATE FILED
1. Medansky, David B. 05-5000 Temporary Disability Inactive Status 02/24/05
2. MacDonald, Rand 04-5003 Indefinite Disability Inactive Status 03/16/05
3. Donahoe, J. Michael 02-5000 Indefinite Disability Inactive Status Costs 9/28/05 11/29/05
4. Marquez, O. Mark 05-5002 Temporary Disability Inactive Status 09/02/05
5. Medansky, David B. 05-5000 Indefinite Disability Inactive Status 11/29/05
6. Radacosky, Daniel J. 05-5001 Indefinite Disability Inactive Status 11/29/05
supremecourt.az.gov
Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona
Friday, April 7, 2006
Consideration of the State Bar’s Petition for Order to Show Cause Why Discipline Should Not Proceed.
supremecourt.az.gov
pending? lma(zz)o
supremecourt.az.gov |
