SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: axial who wrote (14739)4/23/2006 8:45:28 AM
From: Peter Ecclesine  Read Replies (1) of 46821
 
Hi Jim,

>>Are you saying potential receivers can overcome the effects of such interference? Or not be affected by it?<<

'Interference' does not take place in the air. It is easy to measure energy in the air, so laws are made about transmitting energy through the air - free-space laser power is limited because of eye safety concerns. Receivers are designed to receive certain signals and filter/adsorb others. The architect/designers agree to requirements (schedule/scope/staffing/recurring power consumption/etc...) and design accordingly. Increase the budget and you get a more useful design.

'receivers saturate' - the receiver's operation is based on the system's constraints, and the engineer's solution to those constraints. Any solution to the system constraints has limits in time/space/money/power dimensions.

It is not 'but at some point, there's nowhere to hop to, no clear channel, and no avoidable collision.
' - absent system time/space/money/power dimensions.

Radio astronomy equipment extracts signals from what antennas receive, and routinely combine receptions from distributed receivers. Their limits are closer to device physics than economic compromise. Their receivers do not saturate.

petere

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext