The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Peter Ecclesine who wrote (14785)	4/25/2006 3:10:21 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Read Replies (1) of 46821

[802.11n] Thanks, Peter. That's pretty much consistent with my thoughts on the matter. Today I came across another piece in EE Times that sheds some more light on some early adaptations of the proposed standard that is now in draft form, and it's not very pretty: --- Analyst: 802.11n gear falls short in testing According to independent tests performed by Craig Mathias of Fairpoint Group, the first round of IEEE Draft N-compliant wireless networking gear from Netgear and Buffalo Technology was disappointing in terms of performance and interoperability. The tests took place in a typical home environment and analyzed Buffalo's AirStation Nfiniti router and client, which makes use of Broadcom's Intensi-fi chipset and Netgear's RangeMax Next client and routers. "Draft N is misleading... we couldn't even get the equipment to talk to each other. That [lack of interoperability] was surprising," said Mathias, who couldn't get Netgear's equipment to communicate with Buffalo's. "We couldn't even get the two Netgear systems to talk." For more on Draft N equipment: - see this article from EETimes: eetimes.com ------ FAC

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next