SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hawkmoon who wrote (185651)4/26/2006 12:27:38 PM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Hawk, you have not answered the question on Niger report and Bush's handling of it. I don't really care that it was an Italian or street vendor who duped the administration's. The question remains, a lot of people easily managed to see it as the fake it was. Why was Bush so desperate to accept it?

>> How is it that after Bush cited British intelligence with regard to information that Saddam was seeking to obtain Uranium from Niger, the British HAVE NOT RESCINDED their analysis on THEIR information??

Is that the plagiarized grad paper you are talking about? You do remember that one, don't you? How is it that they accepted a plagiarized grad paper as the latest and greatest intel report? Regardless, how do the British sloppy work excuse lack of motivation for independent evaluation? If Blair had told Bush to their intel shows Alaska should be invaded before they secede, would he have done that too?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News