SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sun Tzu who wrote (185702)4/26/2006 3:22:32 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Yes. I don't know much about it and will take me time to investigate all the issues around it.

Oh.. I'm sorry.. I thought that the very reason you initially responded to this topic thread was do to Naji Sabri's discussion of Chemical Stockpiles:

Message 22389796

What is significant though, is that pro-invasion information, no matter how skimpy, no matter how poor of a forgery or how weak of a plagiarism managed to find its way to the highest levels but the anti-invasion opinions were scrutinized differently. Why was that? Shouldn't it have been the other way around?

Y'know.. my contention has always been that the reason information was "skimpy" was because Saddam was trying to hide what he was up to..

And when UNSCOM found that document in 1998 that stated Iraq had lied about the disposition of some 6,000 Chemical Warheads, they had originally claimed to have expended against Iran, it was pretty clear cut to me that the regime was not in compliance (and never would voluntarily be so).

So, we can agree that the Bush administration displayed a definite lack in their ability to make their case publicly.

But I contend that there was a case to be made. And I contend that the information we found from our research in Iraq, although still incomplete, confirms that Saddam's government was in material breach of UNSC resolutions and that they were involved in facilitating/conducting terrorist activities.

And I believe there is a growing case that Iraqi Intelligence may have had a hand in 9/11.

Hawk
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News