Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jttmab who wrote (185674)	4/26/2006 3:38:14 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) of 281500

I don't think the UNSC will fall for that trick a second time. I guess it all depends on what rhetoric Ahmadinejad comes out with next... We failed to obtain a binding resolution last month, but apparently we're going to try again after the non-binding resolution expires at the end of this month. One wild card in all of this is Israel. They have stated that if the UNSC doesn't take the necessary steps to prevent Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons, that they will be forced to act on their own in a manner that will drag the rest of the world into the fracas. I really don't want see Israel's back up against the wall to the point where they do something rash. Something so rash that we all pay the price for it. And given that Ahmadinejad has threatened to wipe Israel off the map, they already have sufficient "casus belli" to attack Iran. Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next