SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : OSGE - Osage Energy Corp.
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jmhollen who wrote (22)5/3/2006 9:48:09 PM
From: Chuca Marsh  Read Replies (1) of 63
 
Here the link LOL: DKGR on top of my picks list with OIL GUY DBRM - did I tell you i smelt the oil in the gold ore once?
grabbagersinvestingresearch.com
In Nevada only
web.archive.org
But was in az a while
Significant textural observations argue against an earlier interpretation that the gold mineralization and arsenic minerals formed as two discrete events separated by 40 m.y. In a few areas where calcite and realgar are in contact with ore-stage quartz containing gold-bearing pyrite, realgar and calcite enclose gold-bearing pyrite grains. Massive realgar and calcite distal from these contacts do not contain the gold-bearing pyrite. The presence of ore pyrite in realgar, calcite, and jasperoid requires close timing of these minerals and shows that there is no major time break separating ore-stage and late ore-stage mineral deposition. Textures indicate, instead, that the ore stage and late ore stage formed as part of a single, evolving hydrothermal system. The consistent successive overgrowth of younger minerals on perfectly preserved euhedral faces of older minerals supports the continuous evolution of the gold ore stage into the late ore stage. These results are consistent with fluid inclusions that indicate that paragenetically successive minerals precipitated from an aqueous ore fluid with consistent salinity and gas contents but at declining temperatures. Results show that, within error, the 34, 39, and 42 Ma ages determined for fluorite and galkhaite at Getchell and adularia at the nearby Twin Creeks mine, respectively, most closely approximate the timing of gold deposition at Getchell
econgeol.geoscienceworld.org
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News