SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Westell WSTL
WSTL 6.330+1.0%11:12 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bill c. who wrote (6342)9/21/1997 8:15:00 PM
From: bill c.   of 21342
 
Mark: I can't find the article that stated AMTX/TI being non-standard.... so I went back to look for it in the AMTX thread...

exchange2000.com

* Amati and TI announced this morning an agreement to collaborate on the development of a DSP=based chipset solution to implement Amati's DMT ADSL solution. Interestingly, the DMT implementation produced by the TI relationship will not be fully standard compliant, although Amati holds patents on the ANSI standard implementation of DMT. This suggests that time to market and flexibility are as or more important than to-the-letter standard compliance and further calls into question the value of Amati's DMT patents.

exchange2000.com

It can be standards compliant, just a small matter of how its coded.

The best person to ask about this issue is Steve Macica..

exchange2000.com

Now .... would i expect the TI/AMTX solutions to be category 2 compliant by the end of 1Q97? No, not really... The news release specified that AMTX and TI will provide their core ADSL technology based on their respective DMT technologies. We are talking about < 5 months until the end of 1Q97. This doesn't sound like alot of time. I would be happy to see the MOT category 2 compliant CG and a Non-standard TI/AMTX solution by the end of 1Q97.

These are old posts... so TI/AMTX may have a standard DMT solution coming before 1Q98... until later.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext