SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Solon who wrote (23420)5/5/2006 2:57:33 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) of 28931
 
<Well...you apparently cannot differentiate between science and pseudoscience.>

An implication that YOU think you CAN is the interesting part... on top of that you seem completely unaware that scientific inquiry is where science comes from and is be definition not scientifically proven.... AND that you can somehow discern which scientists have fallen into some "pseudoscience" realm, and which ones haven't.

Further,

1.) All leaps or MAJOR advancements of knowlege & science comes from a complete reorganization of the substrate of what was believed previously. This is often accompanied by ridicule from fellow scientists, and of course know nothings like the Churches, and.... people like you.
2.) Few scientists would go out on a limb and say it won't happen again, especially physicists.
3.) 2.) means that everything we know today could easily be fit into a 'new' paradigm at any time, and in fact, is no doubt on it's way... that is what many research physicists do... look for the new paradigm.. ie. the unified field.
4.) Until recently it has been only spiritual and psychological researchers and practicioners who have espoused that "material realism" is incorrect (The "One" you hate to talk about, but claim to know all about)... a position (material realism) that physicists all over the world are now either a.)Backing off from, b.) pondering and revisiting or c.) rejecting even though they can't definitively prove their position d.) continue to hold onto despite being unable to prove THEIR position and mounting evidence to the contrary.

<It is ALL just a big DREAM to you!! LOL!!>

You may just find it's all been a dream to you as well. :) It IS good to have humour about these things however. :)

DAK
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News