Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LLCF who wrote (23421)	5/6/2006 11:35:28 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) of 28931

"An implication that YOU think you CAN is the interesting part" I've demonstrated an appreciation of the difference. You've demonstrated an inability to differentiate between one and the other. "AND that you can somehow discern which scientists have fallen into some "pseudoscience" realm" You still don't get it! It is not the validity of the belief. It is the method of justifying the belief. "All leaps or MAJOR advancements of knowlege & science comes from a complete reorganization of the substrate of what was believed previously" It comes from refinement and addition. But it does not come from simple superstition. It comes from experiment and falsification. "means that everything we know today could easily be fit into a 'new' paradigm at any time" I've been trying to point that out to you. But such a shift in perspective and understanding would flow from evidence which would withstand peer review and which would attract a consensus. "Until recently it has been only spiritual and psychological researchers and practicioners who have espoused that "material realism" is incorrect" What are you mumbling about??

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next