<Are you being intentionally obtuse for effect? When you make outrageous statements such "ALL the mystics say--blah blah blah" it behooves you to justify such nonsense or to endure deserved ridicule. >
Guy, if you care, you'll look. As I've said like a thousand times there is reams written on the subject... go find it... or just keep throwing stones, which you seem to like so much.
<If you want to argue specific and arguable points, that would be great!>
I dont' want to argue, the point speaks for itself... there's no reason to think Jesus DIDNT exist, since his teachings parallel all the other great mystics... and even that is besides the point, if the teachings themselves are relevant and worthwhile, then who cares if he even DID exist?
I get the feeling you really don't want to even visit the possibility that Christianity might be founded on some valid, worthwhile teachings by a guy who (GASP) might have actually existed. That's your issue.
So if you wan't to argue, go brush up on the topic and argue...
<But if you wish to make moronic statements in a foolish attempt to usher in false premises as axiomatic, then you will get called on it.>
I didn't, and anyone following the thread who wants to look into it, can. Our statements and posts stand on their own integrity.
My statement is JMO, everyone can make their own... I'm sure we already know where your opinion lies after 2 minutes on google. Great! Who cares?? Who are you, who am I??? Nobody.
DAK |
