Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (186356)	5/9/2006 12:00:33 PM
From: Don Hurst	Read Replies (1) of 281500

>>" PS: It's not just the value of the SUVs, it's the value they produce as well. They can produce a LOT of CO2 and maybe that would be just enough to avoid the next glaciation. These things are not linear and the straw that breaks the camel's back could tip us into freezing. I would NOT want to abandon the SUVs and be responsible for not just the loss of the SUVs, but also the initiation of a glaciation which could cost a LOT more than 1 x 5 year old child. I know this economic, engineering and environmental econometric analysis is too complex for most to understand, but hopefully you can grasp the basic ideas. We sophisticated international financial relativity theorists have trouble explaining our complex ideas to the layman [and lay-woman]. "<< Yup Maurice, your caffeine level is getting low again.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next