Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: DMaA who wrote (166292)	5/13/2006 9:24:49 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) of 794187

The author insists in interviews that the historical lies are in fact true. Seems to me it depends on whether or not that is a publicity stunt. Revised history is a kind of science fiction--what-if history or what-if future or what-if alien location or what-if alternate universe. I particularly like such story lines. If that's what it is, then it might be controversial, since what-ifs are intended to provoke speculation and reflection, but it shouldn't be offensive. Of course, the political identity types would make it out to be offensive, but I don't think it necessarily is.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next