SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 231.80+1.7%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dougSF30 who wrote (196636)5/13/2006 4:00:55 PM
From: mas_Read Replies (3) of 275872
 
We are still unsure whether the 2MB Conroes will be single or dual core. I agree with your earlier remark about AMD probably being surprised with NGMA Core's overall performance. I kind of figured it would be in that ballpark and was the reason I was plugging a 90nm tri-core from last year. It would have provided AMD with a high-end product pretty immune, by virtual of its unique multitasking/threading properties, from dual-core Conroe/Woodcrest etc. With a small 512KB cache it wouldn't have been that big either at 90nm, ~250 sq mm. AMD now however needs 65nm asap to push K8 well above 3 GHz to compete effectively with the 4MB Conroes. Hopefully there might be an increase of cache to
2MB to also help. This is of course assuming there will be a dumb shrink and we won't go straight to K8L.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext