2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 386.01

+1.6%

4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (6396)	5/14/2006 9:14:43 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (2) of 217714

Maurice, <<I can't see how I could have earned more from gold in this calculation because you seem to have allocated a LOT more money to gold than QCOM>> ... your puzzlement shouts out your wrong premise. Gold is money, and as such, there is simply less risk to ALLOCATE MORE to it than would be the case of QCOM When I compare my currency positions on purchase cost basis to my largest stock holdings on purchase cost basis, the ratio would be between 16 to 52 folds, and so I am being conservative when I use 16 to make the point you do not get. Chugs, J P.S. please do not mention dividend in the same sentence in which QCOM appears, because it makes the orange juice I just drank come out of my nose.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next