SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: American Spirit who wrote (8515)5/16/2006 6:06:33 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
Clinton never should have been asked those questions.

He was the one who signed the law allowing for such questions to be asked. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. You want to argue that the law should be repealed? I might support you, but it was in place at the time, and before he ran afoul of it Clinton was a supporter of it. He was hoist by his own petard. Its his fault.

The prosecutor was the one who was corrupt.

No prosecutor in the case where he committed perjury. It was a civil suit.

He was recently charged with fabricating evidence in a recent case.

He was charged, so he must be guilty? Do you want to apply that standard to Clinton?

As for charges against Starr - Please present some information about them. Saying he was charged, without providing context is almost meaningless.

Again, if Clinton should be asked unrelated questions like that, let's get Bush on the stand and see how long it takes for him to perjur himself.

I think it might take quite awhile or it might not happen at all.

As for unrelated questions the law that Clinton signed states that they are related.

I tell you what. If Bush ever signs a law that allows for such question to be asked in sexual harassment cases, and then he gets sued for sexual harassment, then I'll support you in your quest to make him answer such questions.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News