I don't get it... CRYP has the commerce technology, i.e., the ability to take credit cards, moneyorders, checks, etc.. and put them into the gaming account, and allow the user to do the flip side.
We know from crypto's stock site that there are now two licensees, and rumor has it there will be others this month.
You wrote that FDCD "has one of the most sophisticated security technology interfaces on the market". Then you said they are looking at possibly licensing it.
Earlier you posted that they might be doing a deal with CRYP, and LICENSING THEIR technology.
Then you went on about drawing comparison between the two companies. I think you are just hyping up FDCD by comparing it to CRYP.
I am sorry, but it just doesn't add up. Are you just inaccurately hyping things up, and sucking in investors?!!
My thoughts:
1) If FDCD licenses CRYP, then CRYP would be the smarter investment, because they will be taking dollars from FDCD!
2) CRYP makes money selling/licensing software. They don't own the casino(s). They have a track record, and are undoubtedly the leaders.
3) FDCD is unproven, and a very high risk. No online casino, and the lottery business is very competitive, and very low margin.
Pete: I apologize if I seen unrespectful or insulting. That is not my intent, but this posting you just made doesn't add up. Perhaps you could elaborate with some facts to back it up. I would hate to see investors get screwed by another IDID, or TWTI. |
