SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Webster Groves who wrote (51441)5/18/2006 2:18:28 AM
From: bela_ghoulashi  Read Replies (2) of 116555
 
Nice try, but bs.

The collapse of WT-7 was the result of structural damage sustained from two of the most massive buildings on the face of the earth collapsing in its immediate vicinity. It wasn't hit by a plane, there was no fire on its upper stories. WT-7 didn't collapse for the same reasons that the towers collapsed, the cause was not the same, so there is no reason to expect it would collapse in the same way. How WT-7 collapsed has no bearing whatever on how the towers themselves collapsed. The towers collapsed from the top down.

Sorry, but you lose.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News