SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 220.91+6.4%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dougSF30 who wrote (197891)5/19/2006 11:39:57 AM
From: TechieGuy-altRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
What's wrong with the simpler explanation?

Dell went AMD in high end servers because Intel doesn't have a competitive 4S solution, and won't until H207 at the earliest. If they started on the project at the end of last year, that would be within a couple months of the dud known as Paxville MP.


So in other words, Dell designed (would have when they release) around 1 year worth of servers and gave Intel the PR hit and AMD the PR boost (that even 500 million could not have bought) just for 6 months of viable product?

That's a simple explanation?

At the minimum the simple explantion is that Dell does not see Intel being competitive in >2S for at least 2+ years AND that segment is becomming an important part of the x86 business AND customers are more than willing to buy (probably demanding) and AMD solution!!

That should send shivers down any Intel long. Remember the days when most profits were made in high end Xeon's?

Also remember that high end servers have a halo effect downwards and the Woodcreast (porpoted) advantage of ~20% in server workloads may not be there even in 2S (4C) or may be severly diminished to the extent that customers may demand a common CPU platform even in 2S from Dell.

TG
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext