Sioux Nation Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation

DJT 11.37

+4.4%

9:46 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Travis_Bickle who wrote (68398)	5/21/2006 11:52:32 AM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) of 362827

Kerry would beat Bush by 20% now. Maybe more. Kerry has nothing to be ashamed of. If Rove hadn't run the most dishonest campaign in history, Kerry would have won. Kerry ran a clean honest campaign with no BS. He pointed out problems that needed fixing whichg Bush has made worse. And people know that. He won all three debates and won on all the issues. Blaming Kerry for Bush's smear campaign and cheating is not only not fair, it's stupid. Nixon and Reagan both came back from defeats to win two terms. Kerry can do it too. As could Gore if he had the determination. Now without Gore in the way, Kerry faces Hillary and Warner. I believe Kerry can beat them. Also, none of the smearvets garbage will be of any use to the rightwing next time. All that BS has been discredited as a huge hoax and the press won't touch it with a ten foot pole. The smear campaign is what is credited with Bush's narrow victory in Republican circles, and the only reason is worked was the press gave it some credence. Also Bush was at 55% approvals then and is now 20+% lower.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next