SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.
AAPL 273.79-2.0%Feb 10 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Don Green who wrote (53176)5/22/2006 12:54:29 PM
From: Done, gone.  Read Replies (2) of 213185
 
How are the speeds compared to earlier Virtual PC software or the dual boot side?

Virtual PC is so annoyingly slow it's pathetic.

Parallels is a "Ferrari compared with the old Virtual PC's Yugo", says Business Week of an early beta (no longer called Workstation, now called Parallels Desktop instead):

businessweek.com

This is what a reviewer said of beta 2 of Parallels (we're now in beta 7):

"The speed in Parallels was astonishing--not simply astonishing for being inside a virtual environment, but astonishing for a real physical PC. The company claims 90 percent of native performance and initial (unscientific) usage suggests they are not lying."

macwindows.com

As far as I can tell, the Windows side operates just as fast as the Mac side. On my MacBook Pro 15" with dual 2.16 GHz processors and 2 GB of RAM, I simply cannot tell a difference.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext