SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dan B. who wrote (288894)5/25/2006 2:53:53 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) of 1575622
 
Re: "Osama bin Laden believes that violence is a way to get what he wants; I do not agree with that approach..."

Good for you! Still, the fact that everything else you said WAS essentially in agreement with terrorists, is probably what allows you to decry America's actions as you have. Anyone claiming 911 is something "due" America, let alone "overdue," is someone believing MUCH which terrorists believe. This is clear.


I don't know for sure what the terrorists believe and neither do you. But what we both know is that America was not sitting by itself minding its own business when that attack occurred. You are like the parent whose kid is the school bully, acting shocked when someone hits your son or daughter after they have been trashing kids all year long. Get over it.........the US has been throwing its weight around for some time. US, the good, seems to have gone out the window since Vietnam.

It seems that's when it all changed.........sometime between the 1960s and the 1980s. It would appear that SOME began to think we had the moral right to decide what was best for the rest of the world. That sense of self righteousness increased with the demise of the USSR. And its dictated foreign policy with the current president.

You don't agree with the deadly actions of the terrorists, but how long will it be until you, like Patty Hearst, are helping them out? Whoops, as surely as I don't agree with you OR the terrorists on many things you'll try to explain over and over, I see that you've already helped them out in your way.

Oh hell, Patty Hearst was from the 1970s......she was hooked up with some radical American group. You are talking nonsense...........there is no correlation. This is much more serious. I am amazed you are trying to speak at this level.

Why don't you start by opening your mind to the fact that proclaiming America was "due" an attack like 911, is a statement siding with terrorists.

Why don't you open your mind to the truth instead of believing the spin you are fed 24/7.

Once you wonder enough over how you came to this position, your mind may open indeed to certain realities as to who are the historic bad actors here, and who has not been nearly so bad at all.

So you condoned giving WMD chemicals to Saddam. Yes or no???Let's hear your position instead of discussing what you interpret to be mine.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext