Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (187580)	5/28/2006 10:43:57 AM
From: neolib	Read Replies (2) of 281500

Yup, that worked real well almost five years ago, didn't it? And occupying one of the their holy sites was precisely one of the grievances - we had dared station our infidel soldiers on the land of the two holy cities, at the request of its corrupt rulers. Yes, I failed to mention the many years of supporting Islamic suppressing regimes in the Islamic countries as another one of America's great accomplishments. Also, trying to secure their oil on favorable terms to us. Also currently occupying two of their countries. Also our very asymmetric support of Israel in $ and talk. I have not noticed Islamic wacko's attacking Brazil for example, largely because Brazil does not do the things listed above. If you want to think it is because they have not gotten around to converting Brazil to Islam simply because B follows A in the alphabet, but will at some point in time, fine. In foreign policy, just like in science (such things as evolution and global warming) it helps to be able to understand cause and effect. Some people consistently deny such things. Why?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next