Presstek -- Stock of the Decade?? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Presstek -- Stock of the Decade??

PRST 0.0001000

0.0%

Sep 29 10:16 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: E who wrote (6466)	9/22/1997 7:41:00 PM
From: Nanny	of 11098

JM, While looking for Ivan's post, I found this. Does the current Father E. sound like the previous Father E.? ------------------- To: count gold (3416 ) From: Father E. Jun 9 1997 1:10PM EST Reply #3419 of 6466 The problem is that a senior VP with a financial services company with 13 years experience should know better then to write for public dissemination financial research which appears to be partly fictious or based on false assumptions. I hope Primerica has an ethics code and I am sure they have counsel or a compliance officer who would not have liked to see such financial research posted. Alcoa does not <<control>> 50% of can market <<Alcoa believed that with the Presstek technology, they can control nearly 90% of the aluminum can market>> Where does he get that from? Let us see his research. Does Primerica even know that he made public the fact that he works for them? What happens if someone bought stock on this supposed research and figured it must be authentic becuase of the fact that Mr. Mack is a senior VP for Primerica? Did any of you have to deal with some of these class action lawyers? It is not pleasant! Picture this scenario. Stock goes up becuase of what Neil Mack wrote, people buy the stock and then the stock goes down after some people question if what he posted was really true. Do you think that lawyers can't create a class action suite over this? I don't know but I can call one that would know. I am not Ivan L. I just have a burning desire to see truth come to light wihtout some scallywags burning holes in some poor peoples pockets. Father E. ------------------------- ...and then I found this one! ------------------ To: Lawrence of the NASDAQ (3689 ) From: Father E. Jun 18 1997 10:57AM EST Reply #3700 of 6466 You are 44 and into financial services and so is Mr. Mack do you happen to know each other? I am sure your alma matter wouldn't be happy about your spelling capabilites (laffing??). I guess you don't know how onerous class action lawyers are during discovery. Do you know how long it take them to file one of those suits? Turn around is real quick. A former student of mine does it for a living flies around, types out this standard form he carries with him and zap!! It's filed. Then he gets a bunch of out of luck lawyers pays them 25 dollars an hour and gets mounds of papers and computer disk and hard drives!!! They go through all of it. Has NASD ever investigated anyone at your firm? Ask them about their experience. Ask your compliance officer. I am sure you know how careful you must be before you post being a series 7. Do you show your posts to your compliance officer? Does he even know you post? Better Safe than Sued. (Bold emphasis mine) ------------- Hmmmmmm..... Now, back to looking for Ivan? Nanny

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next