SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : $2 or higher gas - Can ethanol make a comeback?
DAR 32.45+1.6%3:29 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (44)6/1/2006 1:48:15 PM
From: Edscharp  Read Replies (3) of 2801
 
Whether you like subsidies or not, I'm willing to bet heavily that we will see more of them. I personally view most subsidies with cautious skepticism, but we now have to consider the geo-political, economic and ecological circumstances that surround ethanol production

Both Republicans and Democrat hold extremely jaundiced views of our dependence on foreign oil. Even Hillary, who will likely be our President in 2008, is making noises about moving to ethanol in a big way.

Governments main role, if done wisely, will be to hard-start the process. For instance, there are people who would buy flex-fuel cars if they could buy e-85, but e85 is hard to find at the moment. Refiners of ethanol are loath to produce greater quantities without an assurance that there will be a demand to justify it.

This is where government can be instrumental. If, for instance, the government mandated manufacters to make flex-fuel cars only and if, for instance, the government guaranteed to buy surpluses of ethanol from refiners they would set in motion a massive and ireversible move to ethanol.

I don't suggest that subsidies stay in place beyond an interim period of time, but the plan I suggest, or something quite similar to it is going to happen. The cost of government subsidies will be minimal compared to the amount of money this country would be saving by NOT sending our dollars to the Saudis , Iranians & Venezuelans, all of whom hate us anyway.

That, and the sheer number of jobs created by an ethanol economy and the resulting ethanol infrastructure will more than make up for our tax dollars 'lost' to temporary subsidies.

JMO.

P.S. Mother Jones is a radical left-wing magazine that loves to clash horns with U.S. government policy, which in this case is ironic because most left-wing groups who still care about America would love to see America go 'green'.

Ethanol is one of the few issues that almost everybody can agree on (oil companies excluded). It's good for our economy, our security, our ecology, good for farmers, good for agriculture, good for jobs, transportation industry, huge for ethanol refiners, consumers, and is eminently doable.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext