SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (289376)6/1/2006 9:45:02 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) of 1583263
 
The unemployment rate under Clinton wasn't a point lower than it is now. The unemployment figures release in April where 4.7% (and the rate has been going down so it might be lower now). The average unemployment rate under Clinton was enough higher than 4/7% that you would apparently consider it to be "significantly higher" at least if you apply the same standards to Clinton that you did to Bush. This is Bush's 6th year. The unemployment during Clinton's 6th year was very close to unemployment rate today.

If you open the link below, there is a graph.....the graph shows unemployment dipping below 4%.

You grow more pathetic with each passing day. You are all about your ideology and not what's good for this country, a trait very typical of your cohort.

joatmoaf.typepad.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext