Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ilaine who wrote (168042)	6/2/2006 12:25:19 PM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (2) of 793801

This post reminds me of the foolish movies and images Hollywood portrays of military personnel. The truth is far, (I mean way out far), from what you've described via this one conversation. If that person in the military answered the question in that way, he is obviously ignorant as hell toward the responsibilities of military personnel. We are required to follow the Constitution and all "lawful orders" given. Military personnel receive extensive training in rights and responsibilities as it pertains to these kind of issues. So, this conversation either took place a long while ago, or he or she is clueless and needs a lot of guidance and additional training from someone senior in rank. Passing off this kind of a conversation and insinuating it represents a broad based attitude is anti-military and demonstrates a lack of experience and knowledge of military personnel. It would be equivalent to me having one conversation with a corrupt lawyer who believed in gaming the system at the expense of the law, then portraying my fear that all lawyers are dangerous.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next