SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TigerPaw who wrote (67839)6/5/2006 6:36:47 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) of 173976
 
"You aren't going to talk or reason people out of an idea like that. "

Maybe not. What I am proposing is that we take the argument out of the courts. Then nobody is 'legally' married; anyone who wants to can form a contractual legal commitment and call their relationship whatever they want but 'marriage' is not a legal term, which is what is really being argued.

Then if I am hetero and you are homo and we tell each other we are married to somebody, we can relate in one of the following ways:

1) Oh that's nice
2) ha ha ha you're kid'n ha ha ha
3) No your not, yes I am, no your not, yes I am
4) Love love love ahhhhh
5) I hate you
6) Walk away no comment
7) Wanna swap?
8) So what?
9) My way's better, no mine is, no mine is, no mine is
9) Why are you telling ME about it?
10) Gotta light?

None of which means anything to the government.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News