Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (188742)	6/7/2006 5:17:27 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Sun thinks the ayotollahs are not the revolutionaries they once were. He also sees a commonality of geopolitical interests between US and IRAN. All the oil is in shiaa areas even in Saudi which is a sunni country. Sun also feels that despite the new prez rhetoric which is largely for arab consumption, iran would be willing to strike a deal with israel as well. But even if he is wrong, i go back to my comments on allying with stalin against hitler for example to defeat the nazis. And for the iranians even if they are still firebrands they too might want to offset the increasing influence that russia and china have on them being on their borders. Also they dont want spillage from afganistan if the US were to have setback there. Its all interesting stuff and i suggest you take a fresh look at this as i have. Getting al quaeda and bin laden are job #1. No doubt iran has been a terror state but Libya just changed sides and khaddafi is still nuts and still in power.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next