SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 216.83+1.3%12:05 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (201261)6/8/2006 11:41:59 PM
From: Sarmad Y. HermizRead Replies (4) of 275872
 
>> It is still being ramped, as you know.

Yes I do know.

Let's say Fab 36 is 25% ramped at this time. Can it produce parts at same cost efficiency as when it will be 100% ramped ? I expect you to say no, it can't. I understand the idea that there is a good reason for the lower cost efficiency. Still it is lower.

So back to the earlier statement. If a full fab running 24/7 is taken down to 50% for a year ? that's a disaster, right ?

How about a fab that is going from zero to 100% over 2 years. The average is 50% during ramp. Is it a disaster during the 2 year ramp ?

You know where I'm going with this. Is it reasonable to say that AMD will not get the cost savings from 300mm during this year ? or is there some other factor that allows AMD's fab 36 running at avg 50% for a year to be a great asset, whereas Intel's fab xx running at 50% for a year to be a disaster ?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext