SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 217.33-0.1%11:12 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: BUGGI-WO who wrote (201630)6/12/2006 6:34:29 AM
From: combjellyRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
"You must have sharp eyes, I can't see anything specific in
the AMD slides ..."

Rink has a point. There is a noticeable gap between the L2 and the core logic, along with the structure that the guy identifies as "L2 OOO Read/Write Buffer" that doesn't exist on the Rev. F micrograph. In addition, there is a strange area where the "mysterious purple block" is. And it still doesn't look like logic.

So, what is it? A shot of the non-production chips? A shot of Rev. G?

Another thing, does it seem strange to anyone else that they have a non-production test chip with added logic? Don't get me wrong, AMD has in the past done chips not intended for production as a test on a new process, I remember the excitement of the news over 180nm, copper K6s. But the whole point of these test chips is to use something with known characteristics, like a K6 design, change only the variables related to the new process so as to get an idea of how the process is doing. Seems to me that introducing new logic sort of screws the concept up. So what were they testing? New ideas? Isn't that what they have simulators for? I mean, if they are burning through millions of dollars every time they want to test some new ideas....

I am wondering if the whole "non-production test chip" is some sort of red herring.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext